Why the study?
The accuracy of dynamic carotid flow Doppler indices in assessing fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac patients was unknown.
Can dynamic carotid Doppler indices predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac patients?
Can dynamic carotid Doppler indices predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac patients?
Dynamic carotid Doppler indices, particularly Δ total carotid flow, can accurately predict fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac patients.
May guide fluid assessment in postoperative cardiac patients; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation before practice change.
Background: While it has been established that carotid blood flow (CBF) correlates significantly with stroke volume index (SVI), the accuracy of carotid flow Doppler indices in assessing fluid responsiveness in post-operative cardiac patients remains unknown.Aim: to see if Fluid Responsiveness Can Be Predicted Using Dynamic Carotid Doppler Indices After Cardiac Surgery.Patients and Methods: Research was done at Cairo University's critical care unit, which is part of the medical school.There were 70 patients admitted to the Surgical Intensive Care Unit in a row.Patients were divided into two groups: those who responded and those who did not.Results: Δ total carotid flow, Δ systolic carotid flow, Δ corrected carotid flow time, and Δ HR % change were significantly higher among responder's group than non-responder (16.47±3.73,13.18±4.19,and 14.00±5.22vs 8.44±2.74,5.68±3.33,and 10.16±5.12,p value: <0.001, 0.001, and 0.004 respectively).Significant Pearson link between Δ SV% and Δ TCF, Δ SCF, and Δ corrected CFT (p value: 0.024, 0.039, and 0.026 respectively).Δ TCF% was most reliable indicator of fluid responsiveness with sensitivity 93.1%, and area below the curve (AUROC) was 0.946 (p=0.031).Conclusion: Fluid responsiveness after cardiac surgery may be predicted with high accuracy using dynamic Doppler indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2023 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: