Key result
Carotid Doppler ultrasound during a passive leg-raising test showed moderate sensitivity (87-88%) and specificity (70-79%) for predicting fluid responsiveness after heart valve surgery.
Why the study?
The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of carotid Doppler parameters for predicting fluid responsiveness after heart valve surgery remained to be evaluated.
Does carotid Doppler ultrasound accurately predict fluid responsiveness during a passive leg-raising test in adults after elective heart valve surgery?
Observational (n=49)
Does carotid Doppler ultrasound accurately predict fluid responsiveness during a passive leg-raising test in adults after elective heart valve surgery?
Effect estimate: r=0.551
p-value: p=<0.0001
Carotid Doppler ultrasound measurement of corrected flow time during a passive leg-raising test offers moderate sensitivity and specificity for predicting fluid responsiveness in post-cardiac surgery patients.
Does not support routine adoption for guiding fluids after valve surgery; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Objective. To evaluate sensitivity and specificity of carotid Doppler parameters as predictors of fluid responsiveness after heart valve surgery. Material and methods. A prospective study enrolled 49 adults after elective heart valve surgery. On the first day after surgery, all patients underwent passive leg-raising test (PLR) during mechanical ventilation (MV) and spontaneous breathing (SB). We estimated hemodynamic parameters using prepulmonary thermodilution before and after the test. Carotid Doppler indices such as absolute (∆FTc, ms) and relative (∆FTc, %) change in corrected flow time were calculated. Responders had cardiac output (∆CO) increase >10%. Results. There was a moderate relationship between ∆CO and ∆FTc during PLR test under MV (r=0.551, p<0.0001) and SB (r=0.510, p<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity of FTc-based PLR test in mechanically ventilated patients were 87% and 70%, respectively (∆FTc threshold value 16.4 ms), during spontaneous breathing — 88% and 79%, respectively (∆FTc threshold value 19.4 ms). Similar results were obtained for the relative increase of ∆FTc (%). Conclusion. The FTc-based PLR test has moderate sensitivity and specificity for analysis of fluid responsiveness after elective heart valve surgery. Further studies are required to demonstrate significant of carotid Doppler measurements as predictors of fluid responsiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zozulya et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Fluid responsiveness after elective heart valve surgery (n=49). Carotid Doppler ultrasound (FTc-based PLR test) vs. Prepulmonary thermodilution was evaluated on Fluid responsiveness (cardiac output increase >10%) (r=0.551, p=<0.0001). Carotid Doppler ultrasound during a passive leg-raising test showed moderate sensitivity (87-88%) and specificity (70-79%) for predicting fluid responsiveness after heart valve surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: