Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
X‐ray investigations of nine smectogenic substances exhibiting the smectic Ad, A1 and crystalline E phases were performed at various temperatures. X‐ray patterns yielded the layer thickness d (Ad, A1 phases) and orthorhombic unit cell parameters (E phase). The layer thickness of the Ad phase in 4′‐n‐alkyl‐4‐cyanobiphenyls (nCBs) has different temperature coefficients for shorter (n = 8–10) and longer (n = 12–14) members, which is explained as resulting from two competing effects: a weakening with temperature of the intermolecular association energy that favours an increase in d, and the increasing number of conformers which reduces the molecular length. A small anisotropy of the thermal expansivity in the smectic phases was found by comparing the linear quantity d(T) with the linearized bulk characteristic of the system, V −3(T), where V = 1/ρ is the specific volume, ρ is the density. Differences between the slopes of the two quantities are less in the case of the A1 phase of two nDBTs (5‐n‐alkyl‐2‐(4′‐isothiocyanatophenyl)‐1,3‐dioxanes). The present X‐ray data and recent results of studies of the low frequency relaxation process in these compounds (under atmospheric as well as elevated pressures) give a consistent picture of molecular reorientations around the short axes in the smectic phases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urban et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: