Why the study?
Does physical conditioning affect haemostatic and rheological responses to strenuous exercise in males?
Does physical conditioning affect haemostatic and rheological responses to strenuous exercise in males?
Physical conditioning does not appear to alter the acute haemocoagulatory and haemorheological responses to strenuous exercise, suggesting these factors do not mediate the cardiovascular benefits of exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Acute haemostatic responses to exercise appear independent of conditioning; leaves open their mediation of cardiovascular benefits.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate how physical conditioning is associated with haemostatic and rheological responses to strenuous exercise. A total of 25 males, divided into two groups differing in exercise fitness (14 sedentary and 11 active), underwent exercise testing on a bicycle ergometer with an initial 25 W workload increasing by the same amount every 3 min. The following variables were evaluated before and after the test: platelet count and aggregability, plasma fibrinogen, fibrinolytic degradation products, viscometry and micro-haematocrit. Significant differences in baseline values between the two groups were found only for blood viscosity. Irrespective of the group, significantly increased values were demonstrated for all the variables, except platelet aggregability and fibrinogen levels, in response to strenuous exercise. It is concluded that the possible protective effect of exercise against cardiovascular disease does not seem to be related to changes in the haemorheological and haemostatic measures evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Scalzi et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: