Why the study?
Does single-lead VDD pacing compared to DDD pacing maintain adequate P-wave amplitude in dynamic conditions in patients with AV block and normal sinus function?
Does single-lead VDD pacing compared to DDD pacing maintain adequate P-wave amplitude in dynamic conditions in patients with AV block and normal sinus function?
Both single-lead VDD and DDD pacing systems show wide variations in P-wave amplitude during dynamic conditions, but constant atrial tracking can be maintained with appropriate programming based on supine values.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supine programming may suffice to maintain atrial tracking despite dynamic P-wave variation in VDD or DDD; leaves open need for randomized long-term comparisons.
BACKGROUND: Single-lead VDD pacing systems are an alternative to conventional DDD pacemakers in patients with atrioventricular (AV) block and normal sinus function. HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to assess changes of P-wave amplitude occurring in dynamic conditions in two groups of patients with a single-lead VDD and with a DDD pacing system, respectively. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with second- or third-degree AV block and normal sinus function were enrolled prospectively into the study. Seventeen patients were implanted with a single-lead VDD pacing system and 11 with a DDD pacemaker. Patients were evaluated at 3 months (all patients) and at 6 months (26 patients) at supine and in dynamic conditions (postural changes, hyperventilation, and during exercise). RESULTS: Mean P-wave values at supine were 1.92 +/- 1.10 mV at 3 months and 1.76 +/- 1.01 mV at 6 months for VDD systems, and 4.63 +/- 2.18 mV at 3 months and 4.58 +/- 2.80 mV at 6 months for DDD pacemakers. In dynamic conditions, P-wave amplitude changes compared with supine condition ranged between -74 and +226% in VDD, and between -53 and +138% in DDD; however P-wave amplitudes showed no significant changes compared with baseline. Moreover, changes in atrial signal amplitudes did not occur randomly, and in both systems P-wave amplitudes remained significantly correlated with supine values. CONCLUSIONS: A wide range of P-wave amplitude variations occurs in different postural conditions or during exercise, both with single-lead VDD and DDD pacing systems. However, with appropriate programming of atrial sensitivity based on supine values, constant atrial tracking can be maintained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Boriani et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: