Why the study?
Does targeted external heavy ion irradiation reduce ventricular arrhythmia inducibility in dogs with myocardial infarction?
Does targeted external heavy ion irradiation reduce ventricular arrhythmia inducibility in dogs with myocardial infarction?
Targeted external heavy ion irradiation reduces long-term vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmias in a canine model of myocardial infarction, associated with increased Cx43 expression.
Hypothesis-generating for post-MI arrhythmia suppression; clinical translation requires prospective human trials.
BACKGROUND: Targeted external heavy ion irradiation (THIR) of rabbit hearts 2 weeks after myocardial infarction (MI) reduced the vulnerability of fatal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT/VF) in association with the increased connexin43 (Cx43). Increased Cx43 was maintained for at least 1 year in normal rabbits, but the long-term antiarrhythmic effects in the MI model are unknown. We investigated the propensity for late potentials and VT/VF inducibility. METHODS: , 15 Gy) 2 weeks later (MI + THIR group), and four without THIR served as controls (MI group). Signal-averaged electrocardiography, programmed electrical stimulation, immunohistochemical analysis, and echocardiograms were performed at 1 year. RESULTS: Filtered QRS duration was exacerbated after MI and remained unchanged for 1 year in the MI group (118 ± 1.4 ms), but significantly returned toward baseline in the MI + THIR group (109 ± 6.9 ms). Similarly, root mean square voltage of the last 40 ms was exacerbated after MI, but recovered after THIR. VT/VF inducibility decreased to 25% in the MI + THIR group compared with 100% in the MI group. Immunostaining Cx43 expression in cardiac tissues significantly increased by 24-45% in the MI + THIR group. Left ventricular ejection fractions remained within the normal range in both groups. CONCLUSION: C irradiation attenuated vulnerability to ventricular arrhythmia after the induction of MI for at least 1 year through the modulation of Cx43 expression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amino et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: