Why the study?
Systemic inflammation is increasingly appreciated in thrombosis, motivating investigation into whether inflammatory markers NLR and MHR are associated with left atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast in non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
Are neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio associated with left atrial appendage thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Are neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio associated with left atrial appendage thrombus or spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
NLR and MHR are independent risk factors for predicting left atrial appendage thrombus and spontaneous echo contrast in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with predictive value similar to CHA2DS2-VASc scores.
NLR/MHR may aid LAAT/SEC risk stratification in non-valvular AF; leaves open whether they add value beyond validated scores in prospective cohorts.
Background The importance of inflammation in thrombosis is increasingly appreciated. Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) are important indicators of systemic inflammation. This study aimed to investigate the associations between NLR and MHR with left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) and spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional study enrolled 569 consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent risk factors of LAAT/SEC. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of NLR and MHR in predicting LAAT/SEC. Subgroup and Pearson correlation analyses were used to assess the correlations between NLR and MHR with the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that NLR (OR: 1.49; 95%CI: 1.173–1.892) and MHR (OR: 2.951; 95%CI: 1.045–8.336) were independent risk factors for LAAT/SEC. The area under the ROC curve of NLR (0.639) and MHR (0.626) was similar to that of the CHADS 2 score (0.660) and CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score (0.637). Subgroup and Pearson correlation analyses showed significant but very weak associations between NLR (r = 0.139, P < 0.05) and MHR (r = 0.095, P < 0.05) with the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score. Conclusion Generally, NLR and MHR are independent risk factors for predicting LAAT/SEC in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Deng et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: