Why the study?
The rise of cardio-oncology clinics and service lines has occurred in a vacuum of standard practice and training guidelines.
This document provides a roadmap for standardizing cardio-oncology training through a tiered Level I-III system, addressing a critical gap in the education of cardiovascular care for cancer patients.
The innovative development of cancer therapies has led to an unprecedented improvement in survival outcomes and a wide array of treatment-related toxicities, including those that are cardiovascular in nature. Aging of the population further adds to the number of patients being treated for cancer, especially those with comorbidities. Such pre-existing and developing cardiovascular diseases pose some of the greatest risks of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Addressing the complex cardiovascular needs of these patients has become increasingly important, resulting in an imperative for an intersecting discipline: cardio-oncology. Over the past decade, there has been a remarkable rise of cardio-oncology clinics and service lines. This development, however, has occurred in a vacuum of standard practice and training guidelines, although these are being actively pursued. In this council perspective document, the authors delineate the scope of practice in cardio-oncology and the proposed training requirements, as well as the necessary core competencies. This document also serves as a roadmap toward confirming cardio-oncology as a subspecialty in medicine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alvarez‐Cardona et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapies. Cardio-oncology training guidelines was evaluated. This council perspective delineates the scope of practice, core competencies, and proposed Level I to III training requirements to establish cardio-oncology as a formal medical subspecialty.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: