Eighteen Holstein cows were assigned, after a 17-day preliminary period, to three rations, using a double 3 3 Latin-square design. The pounds of alfalfa-orchard grass hay and corn silage offered each cow during the experimental periods were, respectively: Ration A--6, 24; Ration B--1O, 40; Ration C--14, 56. Concentrate was added to each ration so that total feed energy offered supplied maintenance needs plus 0.39 therm estimated net energy per pound 4% FCM. Each experimental period was 4 wk, the last 3 wk being used to evaluate ration effects. Average daily intakes of hay, silage, and concentrate, respectively, for the rations were: A--5.6, 23.3, 26.6 lb; B--8.5, 36.4, 20.5 lb; C--10.9, 45.9, 14.6 lb. Average 4% FCM was 46.7, 46.2, and 43.8 lb daily for Rations A, B, and C, respectively. Milk production on Rations A and B was significantly higher (P < .01) than on C, but gross and net efficiencies were essentially the same for all rations. There was a significant increase (P < .05) in SNF with increasing proportions of concentrate in the ration. There was no depression of fat level in milk on any of the rations. Cows on Ration C gained the most weight, but weight changes on all rations were small, suggesting that the level of feeding employed herein approximated the needs of the animals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeremski et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: