Why the study?
Does continuous remote monitoring using a wearable sensor capture health status fluctuations in a surgical spine patient?
Does continuous remote monitoring using a wearable sensor capture health status fluctuations in a surgical spine patient?
Wearable devices like the Oura Ring are feasible for long-term remote continuous monitoring of surgical spine patients, potentially assisting in identifying early deterioration and monitoring recovery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support recovery monitoring in spine surgery; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
We report the case of a 46-year-old male with long-standing low back pain who presented with a deterioration of symptoms characterised by back and right leg pain corresponding to the L4 and L5 dermatomes. An MRI scan revealed severe central and lateral recess stenosis at L4/5 secondary to a large central disc protrusion. We remotely monitored activity and general health metrics over a time-period exceeding two years. This is the first study to monitor these metrics remotely and continuously in the surgical spine patient. Over this time, he received several interventions including a spinal cord stimulator implant, and an L4/5 microdiscectomy. We tracked his fluctuating health status using the Oura Ring [objectively measuring metrics including step count, sleep patterns, heart rate (HR), heart-rate variability (HRV), and respiratory rate (RR)] and with daily self-reported scores on the Visual Analogue Scale. The Oura Ring is a convenient and lightweight wearable device that is worn on any finger. Taken together, metrics provided a comprehensive picture of deterioration and recovery, paralleling key events in the patient's history. The use of wearable devices is feasible in enabling long-term remote continuous monitoring. This may assist surgeons and rehabilitation providers in identifying early deterioration and monitoring the post-intervention course of recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fonseka et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: