Why the study?
Does a custom balloon-tipped catheter without selective cannulation improve procedure time and image quality compared to standard selective catheter technique in patients undergoing internal mammary arteriography?
Does a custom balloon-tipped catheter without selective cannulation improve procedure time and image quality compared to standard selective catheter technique in patients undergoing internal mammary arteriography?
A modified balloon-tipped catheter for internal mammary artery angiography without selective cannulation reduces the time required to seat the catheter while maintaining excellent image quality and safety.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May shorten catheter seating time in IMA angiography; extends non-selective balloon-tipped options for selective vessel imaging.
Internal mammary artery (IMA) angiography can be difficult and time-consuming. We evaluated a custom designed balloon-tipped catheter, a Berman catheter (Arrow International, Reading, PA) modified by creating an end-hole to allow passage of a wire through the central lumen, for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation. We compared ease of use, procedure time, and image quality of the new catheter with the standard selective catheter technique. Thirty-six patients with IMA grafts were randomly assigned to imaging with either the study catheter or a standard catheter. Image quality, graded from poor to excellent, time to catheter placement in the subclavian artery (TIME 1), time to initial IMA angiography (TIME 2), and the difference between these two (TIME 3) were recorded. TIME 3 defined the time required to find and seat the catheter at the IMA site. The image quality was good or excellent in all but one patient. This one patient, randomized to the standard catheter technique, had poor image quality with the selective catheter. However, exchange for the study catheter resulted in excellent image quality. There was no difference in TIME 1 (P = 0.57) or TIME 2 (P = 0.55) between the two techniques. There was a significant difference in TIME 3 (P = 0.05) favoring the study catheter. There were no complication using either technique and the total contrast volume used was not significantly different between the two techniques (P = 0.32). We conclude that a new catheter technique for imaging the IMA without selective cannulation is safe, fast, easy to use, and may offer particular advantage in patients whose internal mammary artery is difficult to access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Berger et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: