Why the study?
Some patients with vasospastic angina lack traditional risk factors, which complicates diagnosis.
Vasospastic angina should be considered in patients with NSTEMI and non-obstructive coronary arteries even without typical triggers, and repeat angiography may be necessary for diagnosis.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case report underscores considering vasospastic angina in rest angina; leaves open need for prospective data on triggers and therapy.
Vasospastic angina (Prinzmetal angina) is a rare but clinically significant cause of chest pain that occurs due to transient coronary artery spasm, leading to myocardial ischemia. It often presents with chest pain at rest, typically during late-night or early-morning hours, and may be associated with transient ST-segment changes on an electrocardiogram (ECG) but without significant obstructive coronary disease. Typical triggers include cigarette smoking, drug use, and stress-related endothelial dysfunction. However, some patients lack traditional risk factors, complicating diagnosis. We describe a 69-year-old woman with a history of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and venous thromboembolism, who presented with left-sided chest pain, nausea, and diaphoresis. Initial workup suggested a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with elevated cardiac troponin, yet urgent coronary angiography showed no obstructive lesions. Persistent symptoms and further troponin elevation (>2000 ng/L) prompted a second angiography, which revealed coronary vasospasm in the proximal left anterior descending (LAD) and circumflex arteries, confirming NSTEMI precipitated by intense, prolonged vasospasm. The patient responded well to calcium channel blockers and long-acting nitrates, underscoring the need to consider vasospastic angina even in individuals without common precipitants. This case highlights the importance of repeat angiography, the role of vasodilatory therapy, and the potential for more advanced diagnostic or genetic testing to clarify underlying risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Quasem et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: