Why the study?
Vasospastic angina can cause myocardial infarction and malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and a persistent coronary occlusion in a patient with established vasospasm creates an acute diagnostic and procedural dilemma.
Case Report (n=1)
Persistent coronary occlusion refractory to intracoronary nitrate in established vasospastic angina warrants consideration of superimposed thrombosis and may require bailout stenting during hemodynamic instability, though stent thrombosis risk and underlying vasomotor dysfunction persist.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant bailout stenting in refractory vasospastic occlusion with instability; leaves open thrombosis prevention strategies in vasospastic angina.
Vasospastic angina can cause myocardial infarction and malignant ventricular arrhythmias, but a persistent coronary occlusion in a patient with established vasospasm creates an acute diagnostic and procedural dilemma. A man with recurrent troponin-positive presentations and prior non-obstructive coronary angiography developed 99% mid-left anterior descending artery narrowing in 2024 that markedly regressed after intracoronary nitrate; ergonovine provocation was subsequently positive. In April 2026, at age 42, he presented with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after irregular use of vasodilator therapy. Angiography showed total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery at the previously nitrate-responsive segment. Intracoronary nitrate did not restore flow, and ventricular fibrillation occurred during the procedure. Bailout drug-eluting stent implantation restored flow. A proximal right coronary artery occlusion was also identified during the same procedure and treated with stenting. In June 2026, angiographically confirmed stent thrombosis required repeat percutaneous coronary intervention; an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator was subsequently implanted after multidisciplinary review. This case highlights the need to consider superimposed thrombotic or structural mechanisms when coronary occlusion in a patient with established vasospastic angina does not resolve after intracoronary nitrate. Bailout revascularization may be necessary when flow cannot be restored in a hemodynamically unstable patient, but it does not eliminate the underlying vasomotor disorder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yiğit et al. (2026) conducted a case report in High-risk vasospastic angina presenting with anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and ventricular fibrillation (n=1). Bailout drug-eluting stent implantation, repeat PCI, and ICD implantation was evaluated on Coronary flow restoration and subsequent stent thrombosis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: