Why the study?
Does olmesartan improve blood pressure control and reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with arterial hypertension compared to other antihypertensive agents?
Does olmesartan improve blood pressure control and reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with arterial hypertension compared to other antihypertensive agents?
Olmesartan is an effective and safe ARB for managing arterial hypertension, offering sustained 24-hour blood pressure control and reduced short-term variability.
ARBs including olmesartan remain effective and safe for hypertension; review leaves open need for updated outcome trials.
Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a major determinant of morbidity and mortality burden related to cardio-metabolic risk. Current guidelines indicate that controlling and lowering BP promotes cardiovascular (CV) risk reduction. Among antihypertensive agents, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are characterized by an efficacy profile equivalent to other antihypertensive agents and are provided with excellent tolerability and low discontinuation rates during chronic treatments. Moreover, CV outcomes are reduced by ARBs. Olmesartan is a long-lasting ARB which proved to achieve a comparable or more effective action in lowering BP when compared to other ARBs. Olmesartan, in fact, displayed a larger and more sustained antihypertensive effect over the 24 hours, with a buffering effect on short-term BP variability. These are important features which differentiate olmesartan from the other principles of the same class and that may help to control the increased CV risk in the presence of high BP variability. Olmesartan shows similar benefits as other ARBs in terms of all-cause and CV mortality, and a favorable tolerability profile. Combination of olmesartan with long-lasting calcium-channel blockers and thiazide diuretics represents a rational and effective therapy. Thus, ARBs, including olmesartan, represent one of the most effective and safe treatments for patients with arterial hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omboni et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: