Why the study?
Does the formation of PKCepsilon-Lck signaling modules confer cardioprotection against ischemic injury in preclinical models?
Does the formation of PKCepsilon-Lck signaling modules confer cardioprotection against ischemic injury in preclinical models?
The assembly of PKCepsilon-Lck signaling modules is an obligatory step for cardioprotection against ischemic injury, identifying a potential novel therapeutic target.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PKCε-Lck modules merit exploration as cardioprotective targets in animals; human validation required before therapeutic consideration.
The epsilon isoform of protein kinase C (PKCepsilon) is a member of the PKC family of serine/threonine kinases and plays a critical role in protection against ischemic injury in multiple organs. Functional proteomic analyses of PKCepsilon signaling show that this isozyme forms multiprotein complexes in the heart; however, the precise signaling mechanisms whereby PKCepsilon orchestrates cardioprotection are poorly understood. Here we report that Lck, a member of the Src family of tyrosine kinases, forms a functional signaling module with PKCepsilon. In cardiac cells, PKCepsilon interacts with, phosphorylates, and activates Lck. In vivo studies showed that cardioprotection elicited either by cardiac-specific transgenic activation of PKCepsilon or by ischemic preconditioning enhances the formation of PKCepsilon-Lck modules. Disruption of these modules, via ablation of the Lck gene, abrogated the infarct-sparing effects of these two forms of cardioprotection, indicating that the formation of PKCepsilon-Lck signaling modules is required for the manifestation of a cardioprotective phenotype. These findings demonstrate, for the first time to our knowledge, that the assembly of a module (PKCepsilon-Lck) is an obligatory step in the signal transduction that results in a specific phenotype. Thus, PKCepsilon-Lck modules may serve as novel therapeutic targets for the prevention of ischemic injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ping et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: