Why the study?
Does ischemic preconditioning alter epicardial T-Q and S-T segment mapping and coronary blood flow during reperfusion in a pig model?
Does ischemic preconditioning alter epicardial T-Q and S-T segment mapping and coronary blood flow during reperfusion in a pig model?
Ischemic preconditioning attenuates ischemia-induced S-T segment elevation and accelerates the recovery of electrophysiological and flow parameters during reperfusion in a porcine model.
Ischemic preconditioning attenuates ischemia effects in pigs; leaves open translation to human reperfusion strategies.
The effects of ischemic preconditioning on epicardial T-Q and S-T segment mapping, local activation, and coronary blood flow were analyzed in nine barbiturate-anesthetized pigs during four coronary occlusion (5 min)-reperfusion (20 min) sequences. In seven sham pigs, one occlusion was performed after a control period of 75 min. The first reperfusion induced a marked coronary hyperemia [11 +/- 4 ml/min (baseline) to 33 +/- 16 ml/min, P < 0.005] and a rapid recovery (30 to 150 s) of epicardial activation delays, T-Q segment depression, and S-T segment elevation in the ischemia area. This recovery was transiently associated with enlargement of intersite T-Q potential variability (alpha: 2.5 +/- 0.6 to 3.4 +/- 0.7 mV, P < 0.05), T-Q segment overshoot to +1.4 +/- 0.9 mV, and S-T segment reelevation. A brief T-Q segment depression (-2.3 +/- 0.9 mV) occurred during early reperfusion in 60 of 91 electrodes overlying the normal myocardium. Compared with the first, the fourth occlusion induced lower S-T segment elevation (3.4 +/- 2.0 to 1.7 +/- 1.9 mV, P < 0.05), and the fourth reperfusion elicited a faster reversal of T-Q segment dispersion (53 +/- 21 to 43 +/- 16 s, P < 0.05), S-T segment elevation (149 +/- 101 to 81 +/- 45 s, P < 0.05), and coronary hyperemia (8 +/- 2 to 5 +/- 1 min, P < 0.05). This trend of changes was not observed during a fourth occlusion in sham pigs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cinca et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: