Why the study?
Carfilzomib has known cardiotoxic effects, but left atrial strain is not yet included in cardio-oncology risk assessments as a cardiotoxicity marker.
Does left atrial strain measurement predict carfilzomib-related hypertensive cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma patients?
Does left atrial strain measurement predict carfilzomib-related hypertensive cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma patients?
Left atrial strain conduit measurement may help predict carfilzomib-related hypertensive adverse events in multiple myeloma patients, particularly those without pre-existing hypertension.
LAS conduit strain >-22 may flag normotensive patients for closer carfilzomib hypertension monitoring; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Carfilzomib (CFZ) is a proteasome inhibitor with known cardiotoxic effects used in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment. Cardio-oncology guidelines recommend cardiovascular risk assessment via echocardiography. Left atrial strain (LAS) is not yet included as a marker of cardiotoxicity, but it is emerging as a potential indicator of cardiac dysfunction. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates LAS as a predictor of CFZ-related hypertensive cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) in MM patients, with or without prior hypertension. METHODS: A total of 125 MM patients treated with CFZ at the Hypertension Center, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" in Turin, were enrolled. Baseline assessments included transthoracic echocardiography for LAS analysis via Philips QLAB software. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that alterations in LAS conduit are linked to an increased risk of hypertensive adverse events during CFZ treatment. Incorporating LAS measurement into cardiovascular risk assessments may improve personalized risk stratification for MM patients, especially those without pre-existing hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Colomba et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: