Why the study?
Does a screw-in atrial lead with intraoperative mapping improve electrical performance and safety in patients requiring permanent atrial pacing?
Does a screw-in atrial lead with intraoperative mapping improve electrical performance and safety in patients requiring permanent atrial pacing?
Intraoperative atrial mapping combined with a screw-in lead achieves favorable acute strength-duration relationships and long-term safety in permanent atrial pacing.
Favorable acute parameters in one case support feasibility of screw-in leads with mapping; leaves open benefit in permanent atrial pacing.
At the present time, the relatively high atrial stimulation threshold and the low and often unstable P wave amplitude are the main concerns in atrial pacing. As a further contribution to the solution of this problem we used a screw-in atrial lead in 16 patients. During the implantation, atrial mapping was performed in order to establish the position with the best electrical performance. The acute threshold for voltage at a pulse duration of 1 ms averaged 0.49 +/- 0.18 Volt. The acute peak-to-peak P wave amplitude averaged 4.6 mV +/- 1.3. No complication occurred at the time of the implantation. Follow-up periods averaged 12 months. No dislocation or bleeding was observed during a follow-up period of up to 28 months. Using this lead together with intraoperative atrial mapping, it is possible to achieve an acute strength-duration relationship in the atrium at a level similar to that in the ventricle. The results of this study demonstrate that intraoperative mapping is an important stein in enhancing the safety margins and long-term performance of atrial pacing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Minale et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: