This case report highlights the potential utility of adjusting dual antiplatelet therapy based on platelet reactivity testing following endovascular revascularization for PAOD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support platelet reactivity-guided antiplatelet adjustment after PAOD endovascular therapy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Case A 73 year old patient with a longstanding history of peripheral artery occlusive disease (PAOD) presented with an acute on chronic progression of symptoms, based on a long occlusion of the superficial femoral artery (SFA), which was treated by thrombosuction, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, and SFA stenting. Post-procedural dual antiplatelet therapy was initiated and subsequently adjusted based on platelet reactivity testing. Discussion Increasingly complex arterial lesions are treated by an endovascular approach; however, long-term patency rates are often disappointing. In order to optimize the patency rates (dual) antiplatelet therapy is initiated. It is known that a substantial proportion of patients have high platelet reactivity despite the use of antiplatelet drugs. Several methods have been published to test the individual response to different antiplatelet drugs. There is evidence that adjusting antiplatelet therapy based on platelet reactivity testing results in a reduction of cardiovascular events and bleeding complications; however, the optimal test and the exact role of personalized antiplatelet therapy in PAOD is currently unknown. Conclusion Although some important hurdles should be overcome before routine implementation, the concept of post-procedural antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAOD is advocated in order to optimize the results of endovascular interventions, as apparent from the presented case.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weem et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: