Why the study?
Estimates of proton pump inhibitor effects on upper gastrointestinal bleeding in routine low-dose aspirin users are variable, while estimates for lower gastrointestinal bleeding are lacking.
Does concomitant PPI use reduce the risk of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in new users of low-dose aspirin?
Does concomitant PPI use reduce the risk of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding in new users of low-dose aspirin?
Maintaining PPI use for >1 month significantly reduces the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, but not lower gastrointestinal bleeding, among low-dose aspirin users.
PPI use ≥3 months was associated with reduced UGIB but not LGIB risk in low-dose aspirin users; leaves open whether gastroprotection extends to the lower GI tract.
Estimates of the effect of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on risks of upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB and LGIB) among low-dose aspirin users in routine clinical practice are variable (UGIB) or lacking (LGIB). We aimed to establish these risks in the same observational study population. Using UK primary care data, we followed 199,049 new users of low-dose aspirin (75–300 mg/day) and matched non-users at start of follow-up to identify incident UGIB/LGIB cases. In nested case–control analyses, adjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for concomitant PPI use vs. past (discontinued) PPI use among current low-dose aspirin users. For UGIB (n = 987), ORs (95% CIs) were 0.69 (0.54–0.88) for >1 month PPI use and 2.65 (1.62–4.3) for ≤1 month PPI use. Among the latter group, ORs (95% CIs) were 3.05 (1.75–5.33) for PPI initiation after start of aspirin therapy, and 1.66 (0.63–4.36) for PPI initiation on/before start of aspirin therapy. For LGIB (n = 1428), ORs (95% CIs) were 0.98 (0.81–1.17) for >1 month PPI use and 1.12 (0.73–1.71) for ≤1 month PPI use. Among low-dose aspirin users, maintaining PPI use (>1 month) was associated with a significantly reduced UGIB risk. Neither short nor long-term PPI use affected LGIB risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrı́guez et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: