Why the study?
Previous computational frameworks based on patient-specific geometries lacked the flexibility to generate diverse models and evaluate mitral closure across individually tuned morphological parameters or material properties.
A newly developed geometry-based finite element toolbox successfully models mitral valve biomechanics in both healthy and diseased states, offering flexibility over patient-specific geometries.
May enable tunable mitral valve simulations in research; leaves open clinical translation pending validation.
Mitral valve function depends on its complex geometry and tissue health, with alterations in shape and tissue response affecting the long-term restorarion of function. Previous computational frameworks for biomechanical assessment are mostly based on patient-specific geometries; however, these are not flexible enough to yield a variety of models and assess mitral closure for individually tuned morphological parameters or material property representations. This study details the finite element approach implemented in our previously developed toolbox to assess mitral valve biomechanics and showcases its flexibility through the generation and biomechanical evaluation of different models. A healthy valve geometry was generated and its computational predictions for biomechanics validated against data in the literature. Moreover, two mitral valve models including geometric alterations associated with disease were generated and analysed. The healthy mitral valve model yielded biomechanical predictions in terms of valve closure dynamics, leaflet stresses and papillary muscle and chordae forces comparable to previous computational and experimental studies. Mitral valve function was compromised in geometries representing disease, expressed by the presence of regurgitating areas, elevated stress on the leaflets and unbalanced subvalvular apparatus forces. This showcases the flexibility of the toolbox concerning the generation of a range of mitral valve models with varying geometric definitions and material properties and the evaluation of their biomechanics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliveira et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: