Why the study?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography improve the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of mitral valve morphology compared to two-dimensional imaging in adults with degenerative mitral valve disease?
Does three-dimensional echocardiography improve the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of mitral valve morphology compared to two-dimensional imaging in adults with degenerative mitral valve disease?
Three-dimensional echocardiography is a valuable imaging modality that enhances the anatomical and pathological characterization of the mitral valve in degenerative disease, aiding in surgical and percutaneous procedural planning.
Enhances surgical and percutaneous planning in degenerative mitral valve disease; confirms systematic advantages of three-dimensional over two-dimensional echocardiography.
Degenerative mitral valve disease (MVD) is the leading cause of organic mitral regurgitation (MR), one of the most common valvular heart disease in western countries. Substantial progresses in the surgical treatment of degenerative MVD have improved life expectancy of patients with significant MR. However, prognosis, surgical decision and timing of surgery strongly depend on the accurate characterization of mitral valve (MV) anatomy and pathology and on the precise quantification of MR. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography, a major technological breakthrough in the field of cardiovascular imaging, provides several advantages over two-dimensional (2D) imaging in the qualitative and quantitative evaluations of MV apparatus. In this review, we focus on the contribution of this new modality to the diagnosis of degenerative MVD, the quantitative assessment of MR severity, the selection and monitoring of surgical and percutaneous procedures, the evaluation of procedural outcomes. The results of a systematic and exhaustive search of the existing literature, restricted to real-time 3D echocardiography in adults, are here reported.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gripari et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: