Why the study?
How accurate is self-reported history of acute myocardial infarction among patients admitted with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
Population
3,703 patients admitted to a coronary care unit with suspicion of acute myocardial infarction
Comparison
Self-reported history of previous acute… vs Substantiated history (clinical validation)
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Self-reported prior MI warrants record verification in acute settings; leaves open its reliability for unverified morbidity tracking in observational research.
How accurate is self-reported history of acute myocardial infarction among patients admitted with suspected acute myocardial infarction?
Self-reported history of prior myocardial infarction has a high false-positive rate (40%) and should be verified with medical records when assessing morbidity trends.
Rosamond et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: