Why the study?
Although AAP 2017 blood pressure percentiles have been used in Brazil, specific percentiles were recently proposed from the ERICA study, warranting a comparison of hypertension prevalence and associated cardiometabolic risk.
Does classification by Brazilian blood pressure percentiles improve the identification of hypertension and cardiometabolic risk in Brazilian adolescents aged 12-17 years?
Does classification by Brazilian blood pressure percentiles improve the identification of hypertension and cardiometabolic risk in Brazilian adolescents aged 12-17 years?
The use of population-specific Brazilian blood pressure percentiles identifies a higher prevalence of hypertension and associated cardiometabolic risk factors in adolescents compared to US-based AAP guidelines.
Brazilian ERICA percentiles may flag more adolescents with cardiometabolic risk than AAP; leaves open whether national references warrant guideline adoption.
BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) adolescent blood pressure (BP) percentiles were updated in 2017, and have been used as reference in Brazil since then. However, specific BP percentiles for Brazilian adolescents were recently proposed based on data from the Study of Cardiovascular Risk in Adolescents (ERICA). OBJECTIVES: To compare the prevalence of arterial hypertension according to each reference, as well as to assess the cardiometabolic risk associated with the reclassification by Brazilian BP percentiles. METHODS: Data from 73 399 adolescents aged 12-17 years who participated in the ERICA study were analyzed. To assess cardiometabolic risk, 6185 adolescents who were reclassified upwards by the Brazilian reference were 1 : 1 matched with adolescents that were normotensive by both references and were of the same age, sex and height percentile. The parameters evaluated were: overweight/obesity, waist circumference, total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL-c, HDL-c, fasting glucose, HbA1c and HOMA-ir. RESULTS: The classification according to Brazilian BP percentiles resulted in a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (14%, 95% CI 13.2-14.8), when compared with the AAP percentiles (10.6%, 95% CI 10.0-11.2). The use of the Brazilian reference also resulted in higher prevalence of arterial hypertension in girls, teenagers ranging from 12 to 14 years, and those classified with adequate weight, overweight or obesity. In the case-control analysis, cardiometabolic risk factors were present more often in adolescents reclassified with arterial hypertension by the ERICA reference. DISCUSSION: The use of the BP percentiles proposed by ERICA is a sensitive method for tracking Brazilian adolescents with hypertension and higher cardiometabolic risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Medeiros et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: