Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, several classes of parallel, synchronous adders are surveyed based on their power, delay and area characteristics. The adders studied include the linear time ripple carry and Manchester carry chain adders, the square-root time carry skip and carry select adders, the logarithmic time carry lookahead adder and its variations, and the constant time signed-digit and carry-save adders. Most of the research in the last few decades has concentrated on reducing the delay of addition. With the rising popularity of portable computers, however, the emphasis is on both high speed and low power operation. In this paper we adopt a uniform static CMOS layout methodology whereby short circuit power mininization is used as the optimization criterion. The relative merits of the different adders are evaluated by performing a detailed transistor-level simulation of the adders using HSPICE. Among the two's complement adders, a variation of the carry lookahead adder, called ELM, was found to have the best power-delay product. Based on the results of our experiments, a large adder design space is formulated from which an architect can choose an adder with the desired characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nagendra et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: