Why the study?
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve the management of hypertension compared with clinic pressures?
Does home blood pressure monitoring improve the management of hypertension compared with clinic pressures?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Home blood pressure monitoring offers superior cardiovascular disease prediction compared to clinic measurements and has the potential to improve hypertension control.
Accurate identification of hypertension is crucial for the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) provides superior prediction of cardiovascular disease, compared with clinic pressures. HBPM can be a valuable resource for the effective treatment of hypertension, when combined with other modalities used to improve patient education, lifestyle enhancement, adherence to medication and reduction of unnecessary clinic visits. In some developed nations, more than half of households with a hypertensive patient have a device for HBPM. The use of HBPM by patients and the acceptance of HBPM measurements by providers is increasing. The long-term effectiveness of HBPM, combined with telemetry for disease prevention, is promising. More research is still needed to establish its full value. It is predicted that HBPM has definite potential for more effective strategies to control hypertension and reduce the need for on-site clinical care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lawrence R. Krakoff (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: