Why the study?
Does anthracycline exposure cause subclinical changes in LV strain measured by STE in asymptomatic childhood cancer survivors compared to healthy controls?
Does anthracycline exposure cause subclinical changes in LV strain measured by STE in asymptomatic childhood cancer survivors compared to healthy controls?
Speckle tracking echocardiography can detect subclinical late-onset changes in left ventricular strain in childhood cancer survivors exposed to anthracyclines, even when conventional ejection fraction remains normal.
STE may identify subclinical LV dysfunction in anthracycline survivors; leaves open its value for surveillance or risk prediction.
OBJECTIVE: Survivors of childhood cancer treated with anthracyclines carry the risk for developing late-onset cardiotoxicity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate left ventricular (LV) function in this patient group and compare it with healthy controls by means of conventional and speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) after exposure to chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: ; range, 100-460) and compared with age, gender and body surface area matched healthy controls. Follow-up period after chemotherapy was 21.9 ± 17.8 months. Blood samples were taken from survivors and controls to determine brain natriuretic peptide (BNP). RESULTS: Following anthracycline exposure, pediatric cancer survivors had lower longitudinal, radial anteroseptal, and radial anterior strain values compared to controls (P < .05). The calculated global longitudinal and global radial strain values were lower compared to the control group (P < .05). Both groups had normal ejection fraction (EF) and fractional shortening (FS). Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels of both groups were in the normal range. CONCLUSION: Despite normal EF and FS, children exposed to anthracycline therapy may have late-onset subtle changes of LV strain values measured by STE. Whether these changes of strain can predict future risk of developing heart failure needs to be explored in further studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çetin et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: