Why the study?
Does free-hand 3DE with rotational geometry accurately measure LV volumes and EF compared to QGS and 2DE in patients with CAD?
Does free-hand 3DE with rotational geometry accurately measure LV volumes and EF compared to QGS and 2DE in patients with CAD?
Free-hand 3DE with rotational geometry provides highly accurate quantification of LV volumes and EF in CAD patients, showing superior correlation with QGS compared to conventional 2DE.
Supports 3DE for LV quantification in CAD; leaves open prospective outcome validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Measurement of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) is important in managing patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Introduction of free-hand three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) system which is equipped with small magnetic tracking system and average rotational geometry for LV volumes may provide easy and accurate quantification of LV systolic function in CAD patients. PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of LV volumes and EF measurement by free-hand 3DE with rotational geometry in patients with CAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study subjects consisted of consecutive 25 patients with CAD who were scheduled for quantitative gated single-photon emission computed tomography (QGS). LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF were determined by conventional two-dimensional echocardiography (2DE), 3DE, and QGS. Three-dimensional echocardiography data acquisition and analysis were possible in 22 of 25 subjects (feasibility 88%). In this 3DE system, image acquisition time was 2 minutes, and 5 minutes were needed for off-line analysis of LV volumes and EF. Correlations and the limits of agreement between 3DE and QGS (r = 0.97, 0.0 +/- 9.1 ml for EDV, r = 0.99, 0.0 +/- 5.0 ml for ESV, and r = 0.97, 0.5 +/- 3.3% for EF, respectively) were superior to those between 2DE and QGS (r = 0.85, 12.6 +/- 26.8 ml for EDV, r = 0.85, 9.7 +/- 26.1 ml for ESV, and r = 0.90, -1.3 +/- 6.9% for EF, respectively). Inter- and intra-observer variabilities of 3DE were smaller than that of 2DE (5% vs 10%, 5% vs 10% for EDV, 6% vs 13%, 5% vs 9% for ESV, and 4% vs 11%, 4% vs 6% for EF, respectively). CONCLUSION: Three-dimensional echocardiography using magnetic tracking system and average rotational geometry offered a feasible and accurate method for quantification of LV volumes and EF in patients with CAD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukuda et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: