Why the study?
Implementing interventional therapy for resistant hypertension remains challenging and controversial, requiring updated evaluation of device-based therapies such as carotid baroreceptor stimulation, renal denervation, and arteriovenous fistula creation.
Interventional therapies such as renal denervation and carotid baroreceptor stimulation can provide significant blood pressure reduction and improved cardiovascular outcomes in carefully selected patients with resistant hypertension.
May support device therapy in selected resistant hypertension after multidisciplinary review; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
Hypertension represents a major public health issue, affecting about 26% of the world's population. It is the most common cardiovascular risk factor worldwide, with a prevalence that continues to grow. Among this hypertensive population, a critical subgroup is that of patients with resistant hypertension. For subjects with truly resistant hypertension, the next step after nonpharmacological interventions and drug therapy is represented by interventional treatment. However, implementing an interventional approach in resistant hypertension represents a real challenge. The decision needs to be undertaken in multidisciplinary teams, which must include a specialist in hypertension, and it is not routinely recommended. The main device-based therapies for hypertension are represented by carotid baroreceptor stimulation, renal denervation, and the creation of an arteriovenous fistula. Until 2018, there was an important controversy on the beneficial effects of renal sympathetic denervation. One cannot ignore, however, the positive results of interventional therapy for treatment-resistant hypertension obtained in different trials conducted on a large number of patients. A significant reduction in blood pressure values and an improvement in cardiovascular outcomes could be attained with interventional therapy through a rigorous selection of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clément et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: