Why the study?
What are the advantages, limitations, and validity of new noninvasive hemodynamic monitors compared to standard monitoring in obstetric patients?
What are the advantages, limitations, and validity of new noninvasive hemodynamic monitors compared to standard monitoring in obstetric patients?
This review discusses the validity, advantages, and limitations of new noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring devices in obstetric management.
New hemodynamic monitors require prospective validation before supplementing standard obstetric care; this review leaves open their routine clinical adoption.
Clinicians managing obstetric patients are dependent on valid hemodynamic measurements to guide care. Heart rate and noninvasive blood pressure guide most current care. New hemodynamic monitors are being used to report research findings and are being investigated by clinicians for their value to supplement standard monitoring. These include arterial pulse contour analysis, Doppler velocimetry, and bioimpedance among others. This chapter serves to present these new devices with a critical review of their advantages and limitations, and most importantly the validity of their measurements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
John T. Sullivan (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: