Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: In order to deliver the precise dose to the target in radiotherapy, absorbed dose to water at the reference point should be assessed. When the calibraon procedure is performed for a reference dosimeter in the 60 Co beam of a Secondary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (SSDL), the total uncertainty in absorbed dose to water (D w) is esmated to be approximately 1.5%. This study a)empts to re-measure the N D,W factors for all available field chambers at Reza Radiotherapy & Oncology Centre (RROC). Materials and Methods: Consistency and linearity checks were performed for a range of available chambers using a check source. The N D,W factors were also measured for the ionizaon chambers. All cylindrical chambers have been cross calibrated at 6 MV photon beam using a Siemens Primus Plus Linac. The Plane Parallel Chamber has been cross calibrated at the highest available electron beam and the ND,W factor has been measured. Results: The tolerance of consistency and linearity checks has been reported to be within 0.3%. The ND,W value for field Farmer chamber was found in agreement with cerf icate within 1%. In contrast for small acve volume chambers, the deviaon from the SSDL reports was 2.3%. For the plane parallel chamber, the difference between SSDL and Home measurements are found to be 12%. Conclusion: Although the calibraon of reference chambers used for absolute dosimetry through a Primary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (PSDL) or SSDL is recommended, for field chambers this can be done at home department as a Terary Standard Dosimetry Laboratory (TSDL).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdollahi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: