Why the study?
Does occupation (protective service vs executive/administrative/managerial) affect hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in US workers?
Does occupation (protective service vs executive/administrative/managerial) affect hypertension awareness, treatment, and control in US workers?
Protective service workers have lower rates of hypertension awareness, treatment, and control compared to executive workers, highlighting a need for targeted worksite interventions.
Protective service work was associated with poorer hypertension control; leaves open whether occupation-targeted interventions improve outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The role of occupation in the management of cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension is not well known. METHODS: We analyzed the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data of 6928 workers aged 20 years or older from 40 occupational groups. Hypertension was defined as measured blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or greater or self-reported use of antihypertensive medication, treatment as use of antihypertensive medication, awareness as ever being told by a doctor about having hypertension, and control as having blood pressure of less than 140/90 mm Hg among treated participants. RESULTS: Protective service workers ranked among the lowest in awareness (50.6%), treatment (79.3%), and control (47.7%) and had lower odds of hypertension control and treatment compared with executive/administrative/managerial workers, adjusting for sociodemographic, body-weight, smoking, and alcohol. CONCLUSIONS: Protective service workers may benefit the most from worksite hypertension management programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davila et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: