An erbstatin analogue acts as a potent and selective small molecule inhibitor of N-type inactivation in specific voltage-gated potassium channels, offering a potential therapeutic approach for seizure disorders.
Erb may inhibit N-type inactivation in Kv channels; leaves open erbstatin analogues for seizure therapy, requiring in vivo validation.
In some A-type voltage-gated K channels, rapid inactivation is achieved through the binding of an N-terminal domain of the pore-forming alpha-subunit or an associated beta-subunit to a cytoplasmic acceptor located at or near the channel pore using the ball-and-chain machinery (1-5). This inactivation involving the N terminus is known as N-type inactivation. Here, we describe an erbstatin (Erb) analogue as a small molecule inhibitor of the N-type inactivation in channels of Kv1.4 and Kv1.1+Kvbeta1. We show that this inhibition of inactivation (designated as "disinactivation") is potent and selective for N-type inactivation in heterologous cells (Chinese hamster ovary and Xenopus oocytes) expressing these A-type channels. In Chinese hamster ovary cells, Erb increased the inactivation time constant of Kv1.4 from 86.5 +/- 9.5 to 150 +/- 10 ms (n = 6, p < 0.0 1). Similarly, Erb increased the inactivation time constant of Kv1.1+Kvbeta1 from 10 +/- 0.9 to 49.3 +/- 7 ms (n = 7, p < 0.01). The EC(50) for disinactivating Kv1.1+Kvbeta1 was 10.4 +/- 0.9 microm (n = 2-9). Erb had no effect upon another A-channel, Kv4.3, which does not utilize the ball-and-chain mechanism. The mechanism of Erb-induced disinactivation was also investigated. Neither cysteine oxidation nor tyrosine kinase inhibition was involved. The results demonstrate that Erb can be used as a base structure to identify potent, selective small molecule inhibitors of intracellular protein-protein interactions, and that these disinactivators may offer another therapeutic approach to the treatment of seizure disorders.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: