Why the study?
Does the extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure improve outcomes compared to the intracardiac tunnel procedure in children with univentricular heart?
Does the extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure improve outcomes compared to the intracardiac tunnel procedure in children with univentricular heart?
Modified Fontan operations, including the extracardiac conduit procedure, can be performed safely on the beating heart with significant improvements in oxygen saturation.
Supports safe beating-heart extracardiac Fontan with oxygenation gains; extends observational data but leaves randomized comparisons open.
PURPOSE: For treatment of univentricular heart, the Fontan operation has been established as the definitive palliation. The current controversy is mainly based on the high incidence of arrhythmias after an intra-atrial lateral tunnel Fontan operation. METHODS: From January 1995 until April 2002, 46 children underwent a Fontan-type operation with or without a small fenestration. In 33 patients (group I) an intracardiac tunnel and in 13 patients (group II) an extracardiac conduit procedure was performed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: There was no perioperative mortality. All patients showed postoperative a significant increase of arterial oxygen saturation, from 76 to 86% after surgery with fenestration, or to 90.5% without fenestration respectively. In patients with fenestration procedure, the saturation rose to 90% after closure of fenestrations 9 to 12 months after operation. CONCLUSIONS: Modified Fontan operations can be performed in normothermia on the beating heart with acceptable mortality. The extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure has the benefits of less surgical injury and a higher intraoperative flexibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. Kuroczyński (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: