Why the study?
Bevacizumab increases bleeding risk and potentially venous thromboembolism risk, leaving the efficacy and safety of anticoagulation unclear when bevacizumab is continued versus discontinued in cancer-associated thrombosis.
Does continuation of bevacizumab compared to discontinuation affect the composite of recurrent VTE or bleeding in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis receiving anticoagulant therapy?
Does continuation of bevacizumab compared to discontinuation affect the composite of recurrent VTE or bleeding in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis receiving anticoagulant therapy?
The efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with cancer-associated thrombosis are not significantly modified by the continuation or discontinuation of bevacizumab.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anticoagulation safety appears comparable whether bevacizumab continues or stops; hypothesis-generating, prospective trials needed before practice change.
Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a common complication during cancer, with complex management due to an increased risk of both recurrence and bleeding. Bevacizumab is an effective anti-angiogenic treatment but increases the risk of bleeding and potentially the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CAT receiving bevacizumab, according to the continuation or discontinuation of bevacizumab. In a retrospective multicenter study, patients receiving anticoagulant for CAT occurring under bevacizumab therapy were included. The primary endpoint combined recurrent VTE and/or major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Among the 162 patients included, bevacizumab was discontinued in 70 (43.2%) patients and continued in 92 (56.8%) patients. After a median follow-up of 318 days, 21 (30.0%) patients in the discontinuation group experienced VTE recurrence or major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, compared to 27 (29.3%) in the continuation group. The analysis of survival following the first event showed no significant difference between the groups in uni- or multivariate analysis (p = 0.19). The primary endpoint was not influenced by the duration of bevacizumab exposure. These results suggest that the efficacy and safety of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CAT receiving bevacizumab is not modified regardless of whether bevacizumab is continued or discontinued.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mayenga et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: