This study provides comprehensive normative echocardiographic reference values for healthy Indian adults, highlighting differences such as higher relative wall thickness and GLS compared to Western populations.
Indian-specific echo norms now available; leaves open whether to replace Western references in practice.
INTRODUCTION: Normative comprehensive echocardiographic measurements data for healthy Indians are not available while data for American and European population is available from American Society of echocardiography and European Society of Cardiology/European Association of Cardio-Vascular Imaging and their publications. Available studies of Indian subjects are small and report only limited measurements with focus on left ventricular (LV) volumes. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide comprehensive normative echocardiographic data for healthy Indians from a large sample size. METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional single-center study of 707 healthy Indian adults age and sex segregated which presented detailed and comprehensive echocardiographic measurements including two-dimensional, M-mode, tissue Doppler imaging, speckle tracking echocardiography, chamber volumes, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain and effort tolerance. RESULTS: Our findings show healthy Indians, as compared to US and European population, to have higher relative wall thickness. LV volumes, LV mass, LVEF and effort tolerance that were within American Society of Echocardiography described ranges for chamber quantification. Higher GLS values were observed in Indian population compared to European and American population. Women had higher LVEF and GLS values as compared to men and both showed a gradual decline with aging. CONCLUSION: We present normal reference values for echocardiographic measurements in healthy Indian population, which could be used for future reference and comparison work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sullere et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: