Key result
Angiopoietin-1 and Angiopoietin-2 appear to be promising biomarkers for improving the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis, as their dysregulation correlates with sepsis severity and mortality.
Why the study?
Can Ang-1 and Ang-2 serve as biomarkers for diagnosing and managing neonatal sepsis?
Can Ang-1 and Ang-2 serve as biomarkers for diagnosing and managing neonatal sepsis?
Angiopoietin-1 and -2 are promising biomarkers for the early diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis.
Should not yet change neonatal sepsis practice; leaves open prospective validation of Ang-1/Ang-2 as biomarkers.
Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) are antagonistic ligands that bind to the extracellular domain of the Tie-2 receptor, which is almost exclusively expressed by endothelial cells. Angiopoietins can directly stimulate both endothelial cells and neutrophils for an overall proinflammatory and proangiogenic response. An increasing number of experimental and clinical studies gave evidence that in the course of sepsis the serum levels of Ang-1 and Ang-2 as well as their ratio significantly differ from those in healthy subjects, in non-septic hospitalized patients, and in patients with non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or critical illness. Further evidences have demonstrated that the magnitude of Ang-2 dysregulation correlates with the severity of sepsis and the mortality rate. Since the onset of neonatal sepsis is often subtle and the diagnosis occurs later, Ang-1 and Ang-2 appear to be very promising biomarkers for improving the diagnosis and the management of septic newborns.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mussap et al. (2013) conducted a review in Neonatal sepsis. Angiopoietin-1 and Angiopoietin-2 was evaluated. Angiopoietin-1 and Angiopoietin-2 appear to be promising biomarkers for improving the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis, as their dysregulation correlates with sepsis severity and mortality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: