In anesthetized dogs, L-type Ca2+ channels are partially involved in ANG II-induced adrenal catecholamine secretion, whereas N-type channels are not functionally involved.
L-type Ca2+ channel inhibition may modulate adrenal catecholamine release in dogs; leaves open relevance to human hypertension or therapy.
The aim of the present study was to investigate the functional involvement of L- and/or N-type Ca2+ channels in adrenal catecholamine secretion in response to exogenous angiotensin II (ANG II) in anesthetized dogs. Plasma catecholamine concentrations in adrenal venous and aortic blood were determined by a high-performance liquid chromatography-electrochemical method. In the first series of experiments, repeated infusions of BAY K 8644 locally into the left adrenal gland at 15-min intervals resulted in significant and reproducible increases in adrenal catecholamine secretion. Nifedipine, similarly administered 5 min before BAY K 8644, diminished BAY K 8644-induced catecholamine secretion in a dose-dependent manner and completely blocked the catecholamine response at the highest dose tested. In the second series of experiments, local infusion of ANG II resulted in a significant increase in adrenal catecholamine secretion. The maximum catecholamine response to ANG II was attenuated by approximately 65% in the presence of nifedipine at the dose that abolished the BAY K 8644-induced catecholamine release. This inhibition by nifedipine remained unchanged in the presence of omega-conotoxin. The present study shows that dihydropyridine-sensitive L-type Ca2+ channels are operative in the adrenal medulla of the dog in vivo. The results indicate that the L-type Ca2+ channels are only partially implicated in the local regulation of ANG II-induced adrenal catecholamine secretion, suggesting the existence of another mechanism. However, omega-conotoxin-sensitive N-type Ca2+ channels are unlikely to be functionally involved in postsynaptic mechanisms mediating adrenal catecholamine secretion in response to exogenous ANG II under in vivo conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martineau et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: