Why the study?
Does intravenous magnesium sulfate improve conversion to sinus rhythm compared to verapamil in patients with recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmias?
Does intravenous magnesium sulfate improve conversion to sinus rhythm compared to verapamil in patients with recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmias?
Intravenous magnesium sulfate provides more rapid conversion to sinus rhythm and a better safety profile compared to verapamil for recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmias.
Supports intravenous magnesium over verapamil for acute conversion of recent-onset supraventricular arrhythmias; extends randomized evidence for its first-line use.
Magnesium has previously been used in the treatment of various arrhythmias, but few randomized and prospective studies are available. In a single-blind study, the efficacy and safety of intravenous magnesium sulfate (bolus doses of 5 + 5 mmol followed by infusion of 0.04 mmol/min) versus verapamil (5 + 5 mg followed by 0.1 mg/min) was evaluated in 57 patients with supraventricular arrhythmias (supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and atrial flutter) of recent onset (less than 1 week). Fifteen (58%) of the patients receiving magnesium (n = 26) converted to sinus rhythm within 4 h, and 16 (62%) within 24 h. Verapamil caused a lower ventricular rate, but only six (19%) of the patients (n = 31) converted to sinus rhythm within 4 h (p < 0.01) and 16 (52%) within 24 h (NS). No side effects were observed during magnesium infusion, whereas six patients receiving verapamil had to be withdrawn from further study medication due to symptomatic side effects (hypotension in three, cardiac failure in three). Magnesium appears to be an effective and safe drug for the treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias. The overall efficacy for conversion to sinus rhythm is at least as effective as with verapamil, and its action is more rapid.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gullestad et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: