Key result
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion offers high spatial resolution without ionizing radiation and is becoming comparable to SPECT and PET for detecting coronary artery disease.
CMR myocardial perfusion is a highly accurate, radiation-free imaging modality for detecting CAD, though standardization and automated quantification are needed for broader clinical application.
May support radiation-free CMR perfusion for CAD detection in select cases; leaves open need for larger head-to-head trials.
Perfusion CMR is an attractive imaging modality that is becoming comparable with other clinically diagnostic tests. SPECT and PET are well clinically validated and have good accuracy for detection of significant CAD. However, these techniques have a rather low spatial resolution and are not suitable for the detection of subendocardial perfusion defect. In addition, the radiation burden, the potential for attenuation artefacts (SPECT) and the limited availability (PET) are limitations of these imaging techniques. An integrated assessment of myocardial perfusion, function and viability is feasible with CMR. In addition, compared to other clinically available imaging techniques, CMR perfusion has excellent spatial resolution and no ionising radiation exposure. However, it is not widely available and there is a need of protocol and pulse sequence standardization. Most perfusion analysis remains observer-dependent (“eyeball” analysis) or dependent on bolus dispersion (semi-quantitative analysis). Fully quantitative analysis using CMR perfusion is currently time-consuming for clinical application. Perfusion CMR is an evolving field with numerous future directions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucciarelli‐Ducci et al. (2017) conducted a review in Coronary artery disease. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion vs. SPECT, PET, and coronary angiography was evaluated. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion offers high spatial resolution without ionizing radiation and is becoming comparable to SPECT and PET for detecting coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: