Key result
The paper reviews the rationale for combination antihypertensive therapy and describes the ongoing ACCOMPLISH trial comparing ACEI/CCB to ACEI/diuretic, with no clinical results reported.
Why the study?
Does combination therapy with an ACEI and a CCB reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to an ACEI and a diuretic in high-risk hypertensive patients?
Does combination therapy with an ACEI and a CCB reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared to an ACEI and a diuretic in high-risk hypertensive patients?
This review discusses the rationale for combining an ACEI and a CCB in hypertensive patients, highlighting the ongoing ACCOMPLISH trial which will compare this regimen to an ACEI/diuretic combination.
More than 1 medication is required in many hypertensive patients to reach blood pressure (BP) goals, and initial treatment with 2 agents has been recommended for patients whose BP level is >20/10 mm Hg above target. Diuretics reduce BP levels and the incidence of target organ complications and together with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers, which are recommended in patients with comorbid cardiovascular disease, nephropathy, or diabetes, are effective antihypertensive combinations. Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are also effective antihypertensive agents, and evidence suggests that a CCB/ACEI combination is well tolerated and also decreases the risk of cardiovascular and renal disease. Some evidence suggests that this combination may improve endothelial function more than either agent alone, and its use could potentially lead to better cardiovascular outcomes than a diuretic/ACEI or diuretic/ARB combination. The ongoing Avoiding Cardiovascular Events Through Combination Therapy in Patients Living With Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH) trial compares these 2 effective combinations (ie, an ACEI/diuretic and ACEI/CCB) as initial treatment for reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in older high-risk hypertensive patients. The results of this trial, when reported, should help to clarify the relative benefits of these different therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brent M. Egan (2007) conducted a review in Hypertension. ACEI/CCB combination therapy vs. ACEI/diuretic combination therapy was evaluated. The paper reviews the rationale for combination antihypertensive therapy and describes the ongoing ACCOMPLISH trial comparing ACEI/CCB to ACEI/diuretic, with no clinical results reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: