Key result
Discontinuing antithrombotic therapy for elective invasive procedures was associated with a significantly higher incidence of in-hospital cerebral ischemic events compared to patients without discontinuation (0.24% vs 0.03%, p=0.04).
Why the study?
Discontinuation of antithrombotic medications before procedures avoids postprocedural bleeding but potentially increases ischemic risk, leaving the precise risk of cerebral ischemia uncertain.
Does intentional discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy increase the risk of cerebral ischemic events in patients undergoing elective invasive procedures?
Observational (n=19,209)
No
Does intentional discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy increase the risk of cerebral ischemic events in patients undergoing elective invasive procedures?
Intentional discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy for elective procedures is associated with a small but significantly increased risk of in-hospital stroke, particularly in patients receiving both anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Antithrombotic discontinuation for elective procedures carries low but elevated ischemic risk; leaves open optimal periprocedural strategies in observational data.
OBJECTIVE: Antithrombotic medications pose a challenge for conducting surgical or invasive procedures, because their discontinuation is required to avoid postprocedural hemorrhagic complications but potentially increases the ischemic risk for the patient. This study aimed to estimate the increased risk of developing cerebral ischemic events during hospitalization requiring discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy. METHODS: This investigation was a single-center retrospective observational study. Clinical data in patients scheduled for admission between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, were collected. Patients requiring discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy were identified by referring to the admission database. Patients who developed cerebral ischemia were identified by referring to the institution's stroke center database. RESULTS: Seven hundred ninety-six patients scheduled for nonneurosurgical procedures and 39 scheduled for neurosurgical procedures underwent discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy. Anticoagulation therapy was prescribed in 40.0%, and antiplatelet therapy was prescribed in 69.1% of the patients. A total of 9.2% of the entire cohort of patients were receiving both anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. Bridging therapy was administered in 20.9% of nonneurosurgical patients. No ischemic event was observed in the patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures. Among the entire cohort, 3 patients encountered some kind of thrombotic event-2 of which were cerebral ischemia-accounting for an incidence of 0.24%, which was significantly higher than incidental in-hospital stroke unrelated to discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy (p = 0.04). Patients undergoing both anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy harbored a significantly higher risk for cerebral ischemia related to discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuing antithrombotic therapy during hospitalization for elective invasive procedures-including neurosurgical procedures-entailed a relatively small risk of developing cerebral ischemic events, but the risk was significantly higher compared to hospitalized patients without discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitsui et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Patients scheduled for elective invasive procedures (n=19,209). Discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy vs. No discontinuation of antithrombotic therapy was evaluated on In-hospital cerebral ischemic events (stroke) (p=0.04). Discontinuing antithrombotic therapy for elective invasive procedures was associated with a significantly higher incidence of in-hospital cerebral ischemic events compared to patients without discontinuation (0.24% vs 0.03%, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: