Key result
MR-proANP accurately detected heart failure in children and adolescents with an AUC of 0.76, demonstrating diagnostic performance comparable to the reference standard NT-proBNP.
Why the study?
Do novel biomarkers (MR-proANP, sST2, GDF-15, MR-proADM) accurately diagnose heart failure in pediatric patients compared to NT-proBNP?
Cross-Sectional (n=203)
Single-blind
Yes
Do novel biomarkers (MR-proANP, sST2, GDF-15, MR-proADM) accurately diagnose heart failure in pediatric patients compared to NT-proBNP?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.84)
p-value: p=<0.001
MR-proANP has comparable diagnostic accuracy to NT-proBNP for detecting heart failure in children and adolescents, whereas sST2, GDF-15, and MR-proADM do not provide sufficient diagnostic utility.
Supports MR-proANP for pediatric HF diagnosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
OBJECTIVE: Biomarkers play a pivotal role in heart failure (HF) management. Reference values and insights from studies in adults cannot be extrapolated to the paediatric population due to important differences in pathophysiology and compensatory reserve. We assessed the diagnostic utility of four novel biomarkers in paediatric HF. METHODS: Midregional (MR) pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (proANP), soluble ST2 (sST2), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), MR-pro-adrenomedullin (proADM) and N-terminal pro-B natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) were measured in 114 patients and 89 controls. HF was defined as the presence of HF symptoms and/or abnormal systolic ventricular function. Receiver-operating characteristics were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC) was measured. This was repeated for subgroups with cardiomyopathy and congenital heart disease (CHD). Ventricular systolic function was measured by magnetic resonance or echocardiography. Reference values were calculated according to the current guidelines. RESULTS: The AUC for diagnosing HF was 0.76 for MR-proANP (CI 0.70 to 0.84) and 0.82 for NT-proBNP (CI 0.75 to 0.88). These parameters performed similarly in the subgroups with CHD and cardiomyopathy. By contrast, MR-proADM, GDF-15 and sST2 performed poorly. When used in conjunction with NT-proBNP, no parameter added significantly to its diagnostic accuracy. NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, GDF-15 and sST2 could accurately discriminate between patients with preserved and patients with poor functional status. In a subset of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, NT-proBNP, MR-proANP, MR-proADM and GDF-15 were associated with poor LV function. CONCLUSIONS: MR-proANP could accurately detect HF in children and adolescents. Its diagnostic performance was comparable with that of NT-proBNP, regardless of the underlying condition. Reference values are presented.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hauser et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Paediatric heart failure (n=203). MR-proANP vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (Area Under the Curve) for detecting heart failure (AUC 0.76, 95% CI 0.70-0.84, p=<0.001). MR-proANP accurately detected heart failure in children and adolescents with an AUC of 0.76, demonstrating diagnostic performance comparable to the reference standard NT-proBNP.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: