Key result
Optimal experimental design cuts cardiac action potential model parameter error ~29% versus benchmark protocols.
Why the study?
Cardiomyocyte action potential models are highly nonlinear and difficult to parameterise, limiting them to average cell dynamics rather than cell-specific models.
Does model-driven optimal experimental design improve the identification of cell-specific maximum conductance parameters in mathematical cardiac action potential models compared to conventional experimental protocols?
Does model-driven optimal experimental design improve the identification of cell-specific maximum conductance parameters in mathematical cardiac action potential models compared to conventional experimental protocols?
Automated optimal experimental design produces shorter, more informative patch-clamp protocols that substantially reduce parameter uncertainty when calibrating cell-specific cardiac electrophysiology models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports shorter patch-clamp protocols for model calibration; leaves open clinical translation of cell-specific cardiac models.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Models of the cardiomyocyte action potential have contributed immensely to the understanding of heart function, pathophysiology, and the origin of heart rhythm disturbances. However, action potential models are highly nonlinear, making them difficult to parameterise and limiting to describing 'average cell' dynamics, when cell-specific models would be ideal to uncover inter-cell variability but are too experimentally challenging to be achieved. Here, we focus on automatically designing experimental protocols that allow us to better identify cell-specific maximum conductance values for each major current type. METHODS AND RESULTS: We developed an approach that applies optimal experimental designs to patch-clamp experiments, including both voltage-clamp and current-clamp experiments. We assessed the models calibrated to these new optimal designs by comparing them to the models calibrated to some of the commonly used designs in the literature. We showed that optimal designs are not only overall shorter in duration but also able to perform better than many of the existing experiment designs in terms of identifying model parameters and hence model predictive power. CONCLUSIONS: For cardiac cellular electrophysiology, this approach will allow researchers to define their hypothesis of the dynamics of the system and automatically design experimental protocols that will result in theoretically optimal designs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lei et al. (2023) studied Cardiac cellular electrophysiology (mathematical cardiomyocyte action potential models). Model-driven optimal experimental design (OED) protocols for voltage-clamp and current-clamp experiments vs. Conventional benchmark protocols from the literature (Lei et al. 2017, Groenendaal et al. 2015, and 1 Hz constant pacing/biomarker estimation) was evaluated on Mean root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the marginal posterior parameter distributions to true values and normalized cross-measure optimality scores. Optimal experimental design protocols reduced parameter estimation error in simulated cardiac action potential models compared to benchmark protocols.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: