Why the study?
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reveal discrepancies compared to office blood pressure in patients with office hypertension?
Does 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring reveal discrepancies compared to office blood pressure in patients with office hypertension?
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring demonstrates that a significant proportion of patients with office hypertension are normotensive in their daily lives, confirming the white-coat effect.
Office hypertension may reflect white-coat effect; leaves open whether routine ambulatory monitoring improves outcomes.
To assess the discrepancy between casual (office) and home blood pressure readings in patients performing home blood pressure monitoring, we analyzed office, home, and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and heart rates in 19 patients in a prospective four-week study. After the month of study, the average difference between mean office and manual home blood pressures in this office hypertensive group was 30 +/- 17/20 +/- 6 mm Hg. The blood pressures taken in the office were substantially greater than the 24-hour average blood pressures and ambulatory blood pressures during work or while at home (awake). An analysis of the automatic monitor readings while in the doctor's office and at 15-minute intervals after leaving the office showed a progressive reduction in blood pressure and heart rate during the first hour after leaving the office. A mean 24-hour blood pressure of less than 130/80 mm Hg was found in 13 (68%) patients. These data suggest that patients with office hypertension are usually normotensive but may have a persistent and recurrent pressor response in a medical care setting. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring provides confirmation of not only the office-home disparity, but also suggests that stress other than office visits fails to elicit a hypertensive response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William B. White (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: