Key result
Home monitoring is being evaluated against conventional care for reducing hospitalizations and emergency room visits in a planned trial of 510 patients, with no results reported yet.
Why the study?
The applicability of telemonitoring in advanced heart and/or respiratory failure remains controversial due to methodological weaknesses in prior studies.
Does home monitoring reduce hospitalization or emergency room visits in patients with advanced heart and/or respiratory failure?
RCT (n=510)
parallel groups
Yes
Does home monitoring reduce hospitalization or emergency room visits in patients with advanced heart and/or respiratory failure?
This study protocol outlines a randomized trial to evaluate whether adding home monitoring to coordinated clinical care reduces hospitalizations and emergency visits in patients with advanced heart or respiratory failure.
BACKGROUND: Using technologies of information and communication (TICs) is emerging in medical assistance. TICs application for medical assistance is promising. Its applicability in advanced heart and/or respiratory failure is still controversial because studies have shown methodological weakness which could put in danger their conclusions. Our objective is to evaluate efficacy of the application of home monitoring biological parameters in a multi-level model of coordinated clinical care for patients with chronic diseases with advanced heart (HF) and/or respiratory failure (RF) in comparison with conventional clinical care. METHOD: /Design: Multicentric, phase III, randomized, parallel groups, controlled clinical trial. Patients with advanced HF and/or RF were eligible to participate. Patients received medical assistance by a multi-level model of coordinated clinical care with or without home monitoring. Follow up was performed until 180 days after inclusion. Primary efficacy outcome was defined as the percentage of patients with hospitalization/emergency room visits. Secondary efficacy outcomes were hospital admissions, admissions to hospital emergencies and Primary Care Emergencies, number of days of hospital stay, total cost per patient in euros, mortality, change in functional status, quality of life, assistance and technology devices. Intention to treat, as well as per protocol, and incremental cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed. The number of recruits patients per arm is set at 255, a total of 510 patients. DISCUSSION: This trial could provide some knowledge about the real impact of home monitoring for patients with advanced HF and/or RF within a multi-level model of integrated care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández-Quiles et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in advanced heart and/or respiratory failure (n=510). home monitoring vs. conventional clinical care was evaluated on percentage of patients with hospitalization/emergency room visits. Home monitoring is being evaluated against conventional care for reducing hospitalizations and emergency room visits in a planned trial of 510 patients, with no results reported yet.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: