Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Community-based HIV testing can identify high-risk adolescents and young adults living with HIV (AYALH), but data on long-term outcomes of AYALH identified via community-based testing is limited. We compared outcomes among AYALH 15–24 years identified in community-based campaigns to those who self-presented to an HIV clinic in Haiti. We measured retention 12-months after antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation and factors associated with retention including time to ART initiation, assessed as a binary variable: immediate (≤7 days from HIV diagnosis) or delayed (>7 days from HIV diagnosis). Focus group discussions with providers highlighted AYALH’s experience of entering care via both routes and recommendations for improving outcomes. 606 AYALH tested HIV-positive: 191 community-testers and 415 clinic-testers. Sociodemographic characteristics differed between groups: mean age 21 vs. 22 (p < 0.01), 88% vs. 74% female (p < 0.01), and 90% vs. 74% reported no income (p < 0.01). 12-month retention was 57% among community-testers and 68% among clinic-testers (p = 0.05). Those who immediately initiated ART had higher odds of non-retention (aOR, 1.62; 95%CI: 1.04–2.54; p = 0.03). Qualitative data suggested community-testers lack social support and were less emotionally prepared for diagnosis. Community-testers who immediately initiated ART were at highest risk of non-retention and are in need of enhanced psychosocial and clinical support to optimize outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rouzier et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: