Key result
Higher normalized periprostatic fat volume measured on MRI was an independent predictor of high-risk prostate cancer (OR 1.398) and positively correlated with post-operative Gleason score.
Why the study?
Does normalized periprostatic fat volume on MRI predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in men undergoing radical prostatectomy?
Observational (n=162)
Single-blind
No
Does normalized periprostatic fat volume on MRI predict prostate cancer aggressiveness in men undergoing radical prostatectomy?
Odds Ratio: 1.398 (95% CI 1.037–1.883)
p-value: p=0.028
Normalized periprostatic fat volume measured on MRI is an independent predictor of high-risk prostate cancer in men undergoing radical prostatectomy.
May support periprostatic fat on MRI for prostate cancer risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Periprostatic and pelvic fat have been shown to influence prostate cancer behaviour through the secretion of chemokines and growth factors, acting in a paracrine mode. We have measured periprostatic fat volume (PFV) with normalisation to prostate gland volume on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and have correlated this with grade (Gleason score; GS) and pathological staging (pT) of prostate cancer (PCa) following radical prostatectomy (RP). PFV was determined using a segmentation technique on contiguous T 1 -weighted axial MRI slices from the level of the prostate base to the apex. The abdominal fat area (AFA) and subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) were measured using T 1 -weighted axial slices at the level of the umbilicus and the upper border of the symphysis pubis, respectively. PFV was normalised to prostate volume (PV) to account for variations in PV (NPFV = PFV/PV). Patients were stratified into three risk groups according to post-operative GS: ≤6, 7(3 + 4), and ≥7(4 + 3). NPFV was significantly different between the groups ( p = 0.001) and positively correlated with post-operative GS (ρ = 0.294, p < 0.001). There was a difference in NPFV between those with upgrading of GS from 6 post prostatectomy (2.43 ± 0.98; n = 26) compared to those who continued to be low grade (1.99 ± 0.82; n = 17); however, this did not reach statistical significance ( p = 0.11).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahran et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Localised prostate cancer (n=162). Normalized periprostatic fat volume (NPFV) vs. Lower NPFV was evaluated on High-risk prostate cancer (OR 1.398, 95% CI 1.037-1.883, p=0.028). Higher normalized periprostatic fat volume measured on MRI was an independent predictor of high-risk prostate cancer (OR 1.398) and positively correlated with post-operative Gleason score.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: