Key result
Mutations and polymorphisms in cardiac ion channels and regulatory proteins contribute to arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death through various biogenic mechanisms.
Expanding the investigation of channelopathies to include all molecular processes responsible for biogenic properties, such as RNA processing and alternative splicing, is essential for identifying novel therapeutic targets for arrhythmias.
May support expanding channelopathy research to RNA processing; hypothesis-generating for novel targets and should not yet change practice.
Researchers and clinicians have discovered several important concepts regarding the mechanisms responsible for increased risk of arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. One major step in defining the molecular basis of normal and abnormal cardiac electrical behavior has been the identification of single mutations that greatly increase the risk for arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death by changing channel-gating characteristics. Indeed, mutations in several genes encoding ion channels, such as SCN5A, which encodes the major cardiac Na(+) channel, have emerged as the basis for a variety of inherited cardiac arrhythmias such as long QT syndrome, Brugada syndrome, progressive cardiac conduction disorder, sinus node dysfunction, or sudden infant death syndrome. In addition, genes encoding ion channel accessory proteins, like anchoring or chaperone proteins, which modify the expression, the regulation of endocytosis, and the degradation of ion channel a-subunits have also been reported as susceptibility genes for arrhythmic syndromes. The regulation of ion channel protein expression also depends on a fine-tuned balance among different other mechanisms, such as gene transcription, RNA processing, post-transcriptional control of gene expression by miRNA, protein synthesis, assembly and post-translational modification and trafficking. The aim of this review is to inventory, through the description of few representative examples, the role of these different biogenic mechanisms in arrhythmogenesis, HF and SCD in order to help the researcher to identify all the processes that could lead to arrhythmias. Identification of novel targets for drug intervention should result from further understanding of these fundamental mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jagu et al. (2013) conducted a review in Arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. Mutations and polymorphisms in cardiac ion channels and regulatory proteins contribute to arrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death through various biogenic mechanisms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: