Key result
MR arterial spin tagging using a 2D selective excitation and 3D spiral imaging sequence allows for selective 3D visualization of the coronary lumen blood-pool while suppressing surrounding structures.
Why the study?
Does MR arterial spin tagging allow for selective 3D visualization of the coronary arterial lumen compared to conventional MRA?
Does MR arterial spin tagging allow for selective 3D visualization of the coronary arterial lumen compared to conventional MRA?
MR arterial spin tagging provides a "luminographic" visualization of the coronary arteries analogous to x-ray angiography by suppressing surrounding tissue signals.
Conventional coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques display the coronary blood-pool along with the surrounding structures, including the myocardium, the ventricular and atrial blood-pool, and the great vessels. This representation of the coronary lumen is not directly analogous to the information provided by x-ray coronary angiography, in which the coronary lumen displayed by iodinated contrast agent is seen. Analogous "luminographic" data may be obtained using MR arterial spin tagging (projection coronary MRA) techniques. Such an approach was implemented using a 2D selective "pencil" excitation for aortic spin tagging in concert with a 3D interleaved segmented spiral imaging sequence with free-breathing, and real-time navigator technology. This technique allows for selective 3D visualization of the coronary lumen blood-pool, while signal from the surrounding structures is suppressed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stuber et al. (2002) studied Coronary imaging. MR arterial spin tagging (projection coronary MRA) vs. Conventional coronary magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) was evaluated on Selective 3D visualization of the coronary lumen blood-pool. MR arterial spin tagging using a 2D selective excitation and 3D spiral imaging sequence allows for selective 3D visualization of the coronary lumen blood-pool while suppressing surrounding structures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: